Issue page

DOI: 10.47026/2499-9636-2026-1-19-38

Kuznetsova E.G., Penkin A.V.

The impact of tax incentives and regional infrastructure on venture financing using the example of individual regions of Russia

Keywords: venture financing, tax incentives, innovative infrastructure, regional development, startups, investors, investment activity

The development of venture capital financing in Russia is a key prerequisite for the transition to an innovation-driven economy; however, this process is accompanied by a persistent trend towards extreme geographical concentration of investment capital, which raises questions about the effectiveness of state support measures, including tax incentives and the development of regional innovation infrastructure. The purpose of the study is to identify the mechanisms of synergistic interaction between tax incentives and regional innovation infrastructure, as well as to conduct a comparative analysis of regional strategies that ensure the inflow of venture capital. Materials and methods. The empirical basis of the study was provided by open statistical data from Rosstat, the Bank of Russia, the National Research University "Higher School of Economics", the Venture Investment Association and the National Association of Business Angels for 2020–2024 and the first half of 2025, as well as materials from relevant ministries and business navigators on innovation infrastructure. Comparative structural analysis of regional strategies, qualitative analysis of the regulatory framework and comparative case analysis were used in the work. Results. The venture capital financing market in Russia underwent a structural transformation between 2020 and 2025. The peak in investment activity in 2021 was followed by a sharp downturn. The recovery in 2023–2024 was characterized not by a return to the pre-crisis model, but by a shift towards capital concentration: the total volume of investments increased, while the number of deals decreased, indicating a trend towards larger funding rounds. The key trend was the shift in funding towards later stages (Series B and C+), which accounted for three-quarters of total investment in the first half of 2025. The geographical distribution of the market was characterized by an extremely high concentration of capital in the two main centers – Moscow and St. Petersburg, which together accumulated up to 95% of all venture capital investments. Government support for venture financing and innovation activities was implemented through various regional strategies, notably ecosystem-based (Moscow, Saint Petersburg), aggressive fiscal (Tatarstan) and science-subsidised (Novosibirsk Oblast) approaches. Fiscal measures produced the expected result only as part of a comprehensive policy. Only by being integrated into a vibrant ecosystem with a robust infrastructure, specialised development institutions and mechanisms for science commercialising were they able to attract significant capital inflows. The experience of the Republic of Tatarstan demonstrated success of such an integrated approach. At the same time, the situation in Arkhangelsk and Voronezh regions showed that isolated fiscal measures, not supported by an integrated ecosystem, did not give significant results. Conclusions. The impact of tax incentives on venture capital financing in Russia is indirect and is only fully realized when combined with a well-developed regional innovation infrastructure. Isolated fiscal measures do not provide significant capital inflows, which is confirmed by the cases of regions with low investment activity. The key success factor is the territory's ability to form an integrated ecosystem that combines specialized institutions, dense infrastructure, mechanisms for the commercialization of science, and non-fiscal support. The results of the study substantiate the need for a differentiated approach in regional policy: an ecosystem model with moderate benefits is effective for metropolitan agglomerations and a model for creating compact growth poles with maximum fiscal incentives and advanced infrastructure development is effective for regions with scientific potential.

References

  1. V 2025 godu VRP v Tatarstane sostavit 5,6 trilliona rublei [In 2025, GRP of Tatarstan will amount to 5.6 trillion rubles]. Available at: https://m.business-gazeta.ru/news/690500?ysclid=ml0xcksn10472160718(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  2. Veniamin Kondrat’yev: Po itogam 2025 VRP kraya sostavit 5,8 trilliona rublei [Veniamin Kondratyev: By the end of 2025, the Region’s GRP will amount to 5,8 trillion rubles]. Available at: https://investkuban.ru/articles/news/veniamin-kondratev-po-itogam-2025-goda-vrp-kraya-sostavit-5-8-trilliona-rubley/ (Accessed Date: 2026, March 2).
  3. Vozyakov A. Tseny vyrastut vmeste s zarplatami: Smol’nyy predstavil budushcheye Peterburga [Prices will rise along with salaries: Smolny presented the future of Petersburg]. Available at: https://www.dp.ru/a/2025/08/06/ceni-virastut-vmeste-s-zarplatami(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  4. Vozmozhnosti OEZ «Innopolis» [Opportunities of SEZ “Innopolis”]. Available at: https://sez-innopolis.ru/investoram/(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  5. Investkarta RF [Investment map of the Russian Federation]. Available at: https://invest.gov.ru/map/region/54(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  6. Ivanova M.V. Novye vozmozhnosti razvitiya venchurnogo rynka Rossii dlya obespecheniya tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta [New opportunities for the development of the Russian venture market to ensure technological sovereignty]. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik, 2024, no.107, pp. 50–61. DOI: 10.55959/MSU20701381-107-2024-50-61.
  7. Ishchenko A.I. Mekhanizmy gosudarstvennoy podderzhki rossiyskogo tekhnologicheskogo predprinimatel’stva [Mechanisms of state support for Russian technological entrepreneurship]. Gumanitarnyye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye i obshchestvennyye nauki, 2024, no.5, pp. 178–182. DOI: 10.24412/2220-2404-2024-5-36.
  8. Kurenev D. Skol’ko regiony Rossii tratyat na nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii: infografika [How much Russian regions spend on research and innovation: infographics]. Vedomosti, 2025, Dec. 6. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/articles/2025/12/06/1160914-skolko-regioni-rossii (Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  9. Lavskiy V. VRP Novosibirskoy oblasti dostignet v 2025 godu 2,7 trln rublei [GRP of Novosibirsk region will reach 2.7 trillion rubles in 2025]. Kommersant”, 2025, Dec. 11. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8272538?ysclid=ml0xh6279a126929969(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  10. Makhmudova Z.Sh. Investitsii v intellektual’nuyu sobstvennost’ v ramkakh innovatsionnykh ekosistem: vzaimosvyaz’ i vliyaniye [Investments in intellectual property within innovation ecosystems: interrelation and impact]. Tsentral’noaziatskiy zhurnal mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy i issledovaniy v oblasti upravleniya, 2025, vol. 2, no. 2(2), pp. 210–217. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14982692.
  11. Moskva dayet Rossii valovoy regional’nyy produkt na urovne 4% [Moscow gives Russia gross regional product at the level of 4%]. Available at: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2024/10/10/moskva-daet-rossii-valovoy-regionalnyy-produkt-na-urovne-4(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  12. Novikas R.Yu. Rol’ venchurnogo finansirovaniya v mekhanizme reabilitatsii investitsiy [The role of venture financing in the mechanism of investment rehabilitation]. Ekonomika i upravleniye: analiz tendentsiy i perspektiv razvitiya, 2013, no. 6, pp. 83–86.
  13. Osnovnyye pokazateli sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Respubliki Tatarstan v 2024 godu [Main indicators of socio-economic development of the Republic of Tatarstan in 2024]. Available at: https://mert.tatarstan.ru/file/mert/File/Итоги%20социально-экономического%20развития%20Республики%20Татарстан%20в%202024%20году.pdf(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  14. Osobaya ekonomicheskaya zona «Novosibirsk» [Special economic zone “Novosibirsk”]. Available at: https://invest.nso.ru/sites/invest.nso.ru/wodby_files/files/presentation/2024/03/oez.pptx_.pdf (Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  15. Osobaya ekonomicheskaya zona tekhniko-vnedrencheskogo tipa [Special economic zone of technology-implementation type]. Available at: https://www.spbsez.ru/investors/(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  16. Postalyuk M.P., Beloborodova M.A. Regional’nyye sistemy venchurnogo finansirovaniya innovatsionnykh transformatsiy rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Regional systems of venture financing of innovative transformations of the Russian economy]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki, 2013, no.3(47), pp. 311–315.
  17. Gokhberg L.M., Kutsenko E.S., eds., Abashkin V.L., Abdrakhmanova G.I., Artemov S.V. et al. Reyting innovatsionnogo razvitiya sub”yektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Vypusk 10 [Rating of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Issue 10]. Moscow, ISIEZ HSE Publ., 2025. Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/1068200858.pdf(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  18. Otsenka chislennosti postoyannogo naseleniya na 1 yanvarya 2025 g. i v srednem za 2024 g. i komponenty yeye izmeneniya [Estimate of the resident population as of January 1, 2025 and average for 2024 and components of its change]. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/OkPopul_Comp2025_Site.xlsx(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  19. Rynok venchurnykh investitsiy v Rossii I polugodiye 2025 [Venture investment market in Russia, first half of 2025]. Available at: https://i.moscow/upload/media/default/0001/23/539652ca76c8f81a67df919cf20f8eea1ca06c0a.pdf(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 30).
  20. Safronova E.D. Osobennosti i perspektivy razvitiya venchurnogo finansirovaniya v Rossii [Features and prospects of venture financing development in Russia]. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra, 2024, vol. 14, no. 1A, pp. 334–340. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2024.63.74.041.
  21. Chto dayet status rezidenta OEZ «Tekhnopolis Moskva» i kak im stat’ [What gives the status of a resident of the SEZ “Technopolis Moscow” and how to become one]. Available at: https://prommoscow.info/interesting/become-resident-technopolis-moscow-sez(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 20).
  22. Shamberina G. Rost ekonomiki Nizhegorodskoy oblasti zamedlilsya do 1,1% po itogam 2025 goda[Economic growth in the Nizhny Novgorod region slowed to 1.1% by the end of 2025]. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8421513 (Accessed Date: 2026, March 02).
  23. Sheveleva K.I., Shurinova V.A., Stefanova N.A. Venchurnyye investitsii v Rossii: osobennosti, tendentsii i aktual’nyye problemy [Venture investments in Russia: features, trends and current problems]. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2021, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 295–308. DOI: 10.18334/ce.15.2.11160622.
  24. Shkodinskiy S.V., Stepanov D.A. Rossiyskiy venchurnyy rynok segodnya: problemy transformatsii [Russian venture market today: problems of transformation]. Vestnik yevraziyskoy nauki, 2023, vol. 15, no. 6. Available at: https://esj.today/PDF/29ECVN623.pdf(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  25. «Ekspert RA» podtverdil kreditnyy reyting g. Sankt-Peterburga na urovne ruAAA [“Expert RA” confirmed the credit rating of St. Petersburg at ruAAA]. Available at: https://raexpert.ru/releases/2024/nov15c(Accessed Date: 2026, Jan. 29).
  26. «Ekspert RA» podtverdil kreditnyy reyting Sverdlovskoy oblasti na urovne ruAA [“Expert RA” confirmed the credit rating of the Sverdlovsk region at ruAA- level]. Available at: https://raexpert.ru/releases/2025/jul22e (Accessed Date: 2026, March 02).

About authors

Kuznetsova Elvira G.
Candidate of Economics Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Theory and International Economic Relations, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (elvira.kuz.70@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6804-8655)
Penkin Artem V.
1st year Student, Faculty of Economics, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (artem.penkin.2019@mail.ru; )

Article link

Kuznetsova E.G., Penkin A.V. The impact of tax incentives and regional infrastructure on venture financing using the example of individual regions of Russia [Electronic resource] // Oeconomia et Jus. – 2026. – №1. P. 19-38. – URL: https://oecomia-et-jus.ru/en/single/2026/1/3/. DOI: 10.47026/2499-9636-2026-1-19-38.