References

1. Borbat A.V. Prevyshenie polnomochii chastnym detektivom ili rabotnikom chastnoi okhrannoi organizatsii, imeyushchim udostoverenie chastnogo okhrannika [Excess of authority by a private detective or an employee of a private security organization who has a private security guard certificate]. Bezopasnost’ biznessa, 2016, no. 1, pp. 30–32.
2. Bugayan E.M. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel’stva ob ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti chastnykh detektivov i okhrannikov [Improving legislation on criminal liability of private detectives and security guards]. Yurist-Pravoved, 2011, no. 5(48), pp. 36–40.
3. Volkov K.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya chastnykh detektivov i rabotnikov chastnykh okhrannykh organizatsii [Differentiation of criminal liability for crimes of private detectives and employees of private security organizations]. Rossiski sledovatel’, 2015, no. 14, pp. 21–24.
4. Korzh P.A. Pravoprimenitel’nye i tekhniko-yuridicheskie voprosy st. 203 UK RF [Law enforcement and technical-legal issues Art. 203 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Aktual’nye teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy razvitiya yuridicheskoi nauki: obshchegosudarstvennyi i regional’nyi aspekty, 2015, no. 1, pp. 316–322.
5. Kornev D.R. Problemy kvalifikatsii po stat’e 203 UK RF prevyshenie polnomochii chastnym detektivom ili rabotnikom chastnoi okhrannoi organizatsii, imeyushchim udostoverenie chastnogo okhrannika, pri vypolnenii imi svoikh dolzhnostnykh obyazannostei [Problems of qualification under Article 203 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Excess of authority by a private detective or an employee of a private security organization who has a private security guard certificate when performing their official duties].In:Global’nye i lokal’nye trendy v upravlenii, ekonomike, yurisprudentsii: materialy XIX Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf.: [Proc. of 19^th Sci. Conf. «Global and local trends in management, economics, jurisprudence». 4 vols].Voronezh, 2022, pp. 563–567.
6. Kuznetsova N.I. Ob”ekt prestupleniya: nekotorye razmyshleniya o ponyatii, znachenii, vidakh i otlichii ot predmeta prestupleniya [Object of crime: some thoughts on the concept, meaning, types and differences from the subject of the crime]. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost’, 2018, no. 8, pp. 133–149.
7. Kushkhov R.Kh.Ugolovno-pravovoi analiz otvetstvennosti za prevyshenie polnomochii sluzhashchimi chastnykh okhrannykh organizatsii i chastnymi detektivami [Criminal legal analysis of liability for abuse of power by employees of private security organizations and private detectives]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 2019, no. 2(129), pp. 240–241.
8. Morozov V.I., Eremina A.A. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii prevysheniya polnomochii rabotnikami chastnykh okhrannykh organizatsii ili chastnymi detektivami: zakonodatel’stvo i sudebnaya praktika [On the issue of qualification of abuse of power by employees of private security organizations or private detectives: legislation and judicial practice]. In: Konstitutsionalizatsiya otraslevogo zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii: materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s inostrannym uchastiem. [Proc. of Russ. Sci. Conf. «Constitutionalization of industry legislation of the Russian Federation»]. Tyumen, 2022, pp. 326–333.
9. Novichikhin P.G. Razvitie otechestvennogo zakonodatel’stva, svyazannogo s ugolovnoi otvetstvennost’yu chastnykh detektivov ili rabotnikov chastnoi okhrannoi organizatsii [Development of domestic legislation related to the criminal liability of private detectives or employees of a private security organization]. Vestnik Evraziiskoi akademii administrativnykh nauk, 2018, no. 3(44), pp. 92–94.
10. Pshenichnaya K.S. Prevyshenie polnomochii chastnym detektivom i rabotnikom chastnoi okhrannoi organizatsii: obshchaya kharakteristika i problemy [Abuse of authority by a private detective and an employee of a private security organization: general characteristics and problems]. Akademicheskaya publitsistika, 2019, no. 5, pp. 394–397.
11. Rogozina N.V. Chastnyi detektiv kak osobyi element v strukture pravookhranitel’nykh organov [Private detective as a special element in the structure of law enforcement agencies]. Rostovskii nauchnyi zhurnal, 2019, no. 1, pp. 204–212.
12. Sorokina O.N. Sravnitel’no-pravovoi analiz norm ob otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya, sovershaemye chastnymi okhrannikami i detektivami, po zakonodatel’stvu stran SNG i Baltii [Comparative legal analysis of the rules on liability for crimes committed by private security guards and detectives under the legislation of the CIS and Baltic countries]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2011, no. 3(16), pp. 314–316.
13. Fedorova E.L. Prevyshenie polnomochii chastnym detektivom ili rabotnikom chastnoi okhrannoi organizatsii, sovershennoe s ispol’zovaniem oruzhiya ili spetsial’nykh sredstv i povlekshee tyazhkie posledstviya: voprosy kvalifikatsii [Excess of authority by a private detective or an employee of a private security organization, committed with the use of weapons or special means and resulting in grave consequences: qualification issues]. Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik, 2024, no. 1(104), pp. 95–101.
14. Kharabara I.V. Ob”ekt prestupleniya i ego vidy [Object of crime and its types]. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2020, no. 6, pp. 318–323.
15. Khrenova I.V. Aktual’nye problemy kvalifikatsii prevysheniya polnomochii chastnym detektivom ili chastnym okhrannikom [Current problems of qualifying abuse of power by a private detective or a private security guard]. Zakon i pravo, 2023, no. 5, pp. 262–266.
16. Khrenova I.V. K voprosu o sotsial’noi obuslovlennosti ustanovleniya i differentsiatsii ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za prevyshenie polnomochii chastnym detektivom i chastnym okhrannikom [On the issue of social conditionality of establishing and differentiating criminal liability for abuse of power by a private detective and a private security guard]. Nauchnye kadry, 2023, no. 1, pp. 199–204.
17. Chursina I.V. Ob”ekt prevysheniya polnomochii chastnym detektivom ili rabotnikom chastnoi okhrannoi organizatsii [Object of abuse of power by a private detective or an employee of a private security organization]. Yuridicheskii mir, 2013, no. 4, pp. 63–65.