UDC: 343
BBC: 67.408
Anisimov V.Fh., Akinina N.Yu., Berndt A.A.
On Preventive Potential of Norms with Administrative Prejudice
Keywords: administrative prejudice, double prevention, criminalization, preventive impact, crime
When criminalizing socially dangerous acts of minor severity, the legislator increasingly uses the norms with administrative prejudice, since their application allows preventing more serious criminal acts and negative social phenomena in society. At the same time, the preventive potential of the norms with administrative prejudice has not yet been properly assessed. The purpose of the study is to scientifically substantiate the preventive potential of norms with administrative prejudice. Materials and methods. When writing the article, general scientific methods were used (analysis, synthesis, hypothesis, comparison, generalization), as well as a statistical method (statistical grouping, summary, statistical analysis). The methodological basis of the research is the theory of norms with double prevention. Research results. The article analyzes statistical data indicating that criminal law norms with administrative prejudice prevent more serious socially dangerous criminal acts. In addition, they prevent crimes at the stage of bringing a person to administrative responsibility, as well as administrative offenses in the future. Conclusions. The authors conclude that there is a three-dimensional preventive effect of the norm with administrative prejudice. Consequently, the legislator's attention to the norm with such a design is due to its high preventive potential, since it makes it possible to suppress the criminal properties of both convicted persons and the emerging illegal attitudes of administratively punished persons, preventing further commission of both administrative offenses and criminal offenses, as well as criminal acts with more serious criminal legal characteristics.
References
- Kovalev M.I. Prestuplenie i prostupok [Crime and misdemeano]. In: Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel’stva po ukrepleniyu pravoporyadka i usilenie bor’by s pravonarusheniyami: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Problems of improving legislation to strengthen law and order and enhance the fight against offences]. Sverdlovsk, 1982, pp. 3–14.
- Kuznetsova N.F. Tseli i mekhanizm reformy Ugolovnogo kodeksa [Objectives and Mechanism of the Criminal Code Reform]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i parvo, 1992, no. 6, pp. 78–86.
- Lopashenko N.A. Razmyshleniya ob ugolovnom prave. printsipy ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva. ugolovnyi zakon. prestuplenie, prostupok i sostav prestupleniya. Avtorskii kurs [Reflections on criminal law. principles of criminal law. criminal law. felony, misdemeanour and corpus delicti. Author’s course]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2020, 440 p.
- Malkov V.P. Mnozhestvennost’ prestuplenii: sushchnost’, vidy, pravovoe znachenie [Multiplicity of crimes: essence, types, legal significance]. Kazan, Taglimat Publ., 2006, 140 p.
- Markuntsov S.A. O ponimanii administrativnoi preyuditsii kak osobogo sredstva yuridicheskoi tekhniki i rasshirenii ee ispol’zovaniya v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On the understanding of administrative prejudice as a special means of legal technique and the expansion of its use in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016, no. 4, pp. 31–42.
- Obrazhiev K.V. Ugolovno-pravovye normy s dvoinoi preventsiei [Criminal legal norms with double prevention]. Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii, 2010, no. 3, pp. 167–171.
- Petrov A.M. Normy s «dvoinoi preventsiei» i ikh znachenie v preduprezhdenii prestuplenii protiv zhizni i zdorov’ya [Norms with ‘double prevention’ and their significance in the prevention of offences against life and health]. In: Aktual’nye problemy deyatel’nosti podrazdelenii Ugolovno-ispolnitel’noi sistemy [Actual problems of the activity of units of the Criminal Executive System], Voronezh, Nauchnaya kniga Publ., 2015, pp. 444–448.
- Pobegailo E.F., Revin V.P. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva preduprezhdeniya tyazhkikh prestuplenii protiv lichnosti [Criminal law means of preventing serious offences against the person]. Moscow, 1989, 78
- Sarkisova E.A. Predupreditel’naya rol’ ugolovnogo zakona [The preventive role of criminal law]. Minsk, 1979, 144 p.
- Tarbagaev A.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ v ugolovnom prave [Administrative responsibility in criminal law]. Pravovedenie, 1992, no. 2, pp. 62–68.
- Filimonov V.D. Obshchestvennaya opasnost’ lichnosti otdel’nykh kategorii prestupnikov i ee ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie [Social danger of the personality of certain categories of criminals and its criminal-legal significance]. Tomsk, Tomsk University Publ., 1973, 153 p.
- Chuklina E.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovye normy s dvoinoi preventsiei: ponyatie, mekhanizm preventivnogo vozdeistviya i vidy [Criminal legal norms with double prevention: concept, mechanism of preventive impact and types]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 2023, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 107–122.
- Shesler A.V. Nekotorye aspekty sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovykh norm ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie zakonodatel’stva o vyborakh [Some aspects of improvement of criminal-legal norms on responsibility for violation of election legislation]. In: Osobennosti realizatsii izbiratel’nogo zakonodatel’stva na sovremennom etape. Tyumen, 2007, pp. 59–64.
- Shesler A.V. Soderzhanie obshchestvennoi opasnosti prestupleniya [The content of public danger of a crime]. In: Aktual’nye problemy teorii bor’by s prestupnost’yu i pravoprimenitel’noi praktiki [Actual problems of the theory of combating crime and law enforcement practice. Iss. 5]. Krasnoyarsk, 2002, pp. 25–32.
- Shuiskii A.S. Protivodeistvie terroristicheskim aktam posredstvom ugolovno-pravovykh norm s dvoinoi preventsie: avtoreferat dissertatsii kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk [Countering terrorist acts through dual-prevention criminal law provisions. Abstract of Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2012, 22 p.
About authors
- Anisimov Valeriy Ph.
- Doctor of Law Sciences, Professor, Graduate School of Law, Yugra State University, Russia, Khanty-Mansyisk (anisimov.vf@gmail.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5184-863X)
- Akinina Natalya Yu.
- Candidate of Law Sciences, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Law, Yugra State University, Russia, Khanty-Mansyisk (anu8671@mail.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-7161)
- Berndt Anastasia A.
- Lecturer, Graduate School of Law, Yugra State University, Russia, Khanty-Mansyisk (saguri@mail.ru; )
Article link
Anisimov V.Fh., Akinina N.Yu., Berndt A.A. On Preventive Potential of Norms with Administrative Prejudice [Electronic resource] // Oeconomia et Jus. – 2024. – №4. P. 88-94. – URL: https://oecomia-et-jus.ru/en/single/2024/4/8/. DOI: 10.47026/2499-9636-2024-4-88-94.
