Issue page

DOI: 10.47026/2499-9636-2026-3-122-132

Solonchenko A.D.

Formation of the east Slavic law: from the Veche to serfdom in the interpretation of F.F. Siegel

Keywords: F.F. Siegel, the Slavic law, sources of law, custom, veche, Sudebnik of 1497, court, dependent population, enslavement, institutional evolution

The transition from assembly-based and communal forms of public proceedings to written judicial procedures illustrates how the very method of establishing the truth in East Slavic law changed: decisions relied less and less on the memory and recognition of the community alone, and increasingly required a document, payment, a time limit and enforcement action. Against this background, the issue of how early legal forms prepared regimes of limited mobility of the dependent population without the direct and simultaneous introduction of serfdom is particularly significant. The purpose of the study is to identify the relationship between changing sources of law and formation of legal mechanisms for limited mobility of the dependent population. Materials and methods. The research is based on Sudebnik of 1497, the works of F.F. Siegel on Slavic legislation, comparative Slavic material and historiography of Veche institutions, courts and enslavement; historical-comparative, source studies, textual and lexical-semantic methods are applied. Results. The article consistently analyzes the veche publicity, the effect of custom, the judicial procedure of the Judicial Code of 1497 and the norm on peasant "refusal". It is established that a custom does not disappear overnight, but changes the legal status: it retains its meaning insofar as it can be recognized by a court, expressed in a procedure and confirmed by documentation or public action. It is shown that the right to exit turns into an operation depending on the calendar period, calculation of the "elderly" and proving the legality of the transition. Conclusions. The results obtained make it possible to consider enslavement as a cumulative effect of legal techniques, rather than as an instantaneous replacement of freedom with prohibition. Restriction of mobility turned out to be due not only to direct prohibitions, but also to the fact that the freedom of transition was transferred to a rare, paid and provable procedure. The practical significance of the research consists in clarifying the methodology of reading early legal monuments without transferring later categories of serfdom to them.

References

  1. Arakcheev V.A. Zakreposhchenie krest’yan v Rossii v kontse XVI – nachale XVII vv. [Enserfment of peasants in Russia at the end of the 16th – beginning of the 17th centuries]. Voprosy istorii, 2020, no. 1, pp. 106–117.
  2. Grekov B.D. Krest’yane na Rusi s drevneishikh vremen do XVII veka [Peasants in Rus’ from the earliest times to the 17th century]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1946, 958 p.
  3. D’yakonov M.A. Zapovednye i vykhodnye leta [Prohibited years and departure years]. Petrograd, 1915, 20 p.
  4. Zigel’ F.F. Zakonnik Stefana Dushana. 1 [The Code of Stefan Dušan. Issue 1]. St. Petersburg, 1872, 369 p.
  5. Zigel’ F.F. Istoriya slavyanskikh zakonodatel’stv: kurs lektsii, chitannykh v Imperatorskom Varshavskom universitete v 1913–1914 akad. g. Ch. 1: Istoriya cheshskogo prava; Ch. 2: Istoriya pol’skogo prava [History of Slavonic legislations: a course of lectures delivered at the Imperial University of Warsaw in the 1913–1914 academic year. Part 1: History of Czech law; Part 2: History of Polish law]. Warsaw, 1914, 201 p.
  6. Koretskii V.I. Zakreposhchenie krest’yan i klassovaya bor’ba v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVI v. [Enserfment of peasants and class struggle in Russia in the second half of the 16th century]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1970, 368 p.
  7. Rossiiskoe zakonodatel’stvo X–XX vekov: v 9 t. T. 2: Zakonodatel’stvo perioda obrazovaniya i ukrepleniya Russkogo tsentralizovannogo gosudarstva [Russian legislation of the 10th – 20th 9 vols. Vol. 2: Legislation of the period of formation and strengthening of the Russian centralized state]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1985, 520 p.
  8. Seregin A.V. Yuridicheskoe issledovanie gosudarstva i prava Drevnei Rusi [Legal study of the state and law of Ancient Rus’]. Rostov-on-Don, 2014, 245 p.
  9. Skrynnikov R.G. Rossiya posle oprichniny: ocherki politicheskoi i sotsial’noi istorii [Russia after the Oprichnina: essays on political and social history]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1975, 223 p.
  10. Shtamm S.I. Sudebnik 1497 goda: uchebnoe posobie po istorii gosudarstva i prava SSSR [The Sudebnik of 1497: a textbook on the history of state and law of the USSR]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1955, 112 p.
  11. Bartlett R. Serfdom and State Power in Imperial Russia. European History Quarterly, 2003, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 29–64.
  12. Hellie R. Enserfment and Military Change in Muscovy. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1971, 319 p.
  13. Hellie R. The Muscovite Law Code (Ulozhenie) of 1649. Part I: Text and Translation. Irvine, CA, Charles Schlacks, Jr. Publisher, 1988, 293 p.
  14. Kollmann N.S. Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012, 500 p.
  15. Lukin P.B. Assemblies and Councils in Medieval Novgorod and Western Pomerania. Slavica Wratislaviensia, 2017, vol. 165, pp. 33–54.
  16. Zigel F. Lectures on Slavonic Law: Being the Ilchester Lectures for the Year 1900. London, New York, Oxford University Press, 1902, 232 p.
  17. Vovin A.A. Veche and the Terms “All Pskov” and “Pskov Men”: The Russian Medieval City Assembly as a Communal Structure. Russian History, 2013, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 449–466.

About authors

Solonchenko Andrey D.
a Competitor of Scientific Degree of Legal Sciences Candidate, Department of Theory of Law and Civil-Law Education, The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Russia, St. Petersburg (pass12355pass@yandex.ru; )

Article link

Solonchenko A.D. Formation of the east Slavic law: from the Veche to serfdom in the interpretation of F.F. Siegel [Electronic resource] // Oeconomia et Jus. – 2026. – №3. P. 122-132. – URL: https://oecomia-et-jus.ru/en/single/2026/3/9/. DOI: 10.47026/2499-9636-2026-3-122-132.

Copyright holder: authors. License: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) CC BY 4.0